Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 30, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2018 / March Volume 30 No.1
Testing the “Good Citizens” Theory: Taiwanese Citizens in a Comparative Context

Number of Clicks:3357; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2018 / March
中英文篇名/Title
檢驗「好公民」的認知轉變:比較脈絡下的臺灣公民
Testing the “Good Citizens” Theory: Taiwanese Citizens in a Comparative Context
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
黃信豪
Hsin-hao Huang
頁碼/Pagination
1-40
摘要/Abstract

本研究以Dalton的「好公民」研究為參照,從比較視野勾勒近年來大眾公民規範認知演變與樣態;其次,也以臺灣為個案解析個人如何獲取這項認知。透過ISSP兩年度調查資料的分析,本文發現公民規範認知應被區分為公民職責、自主參與以及社群責任等三方面內涵。其次,穩定民主國家、新興民主國家的認知儘管有所差異,但演變趨勢卻相當一致。當考慮個人年齡因素,跨國比較分析與臺灣實證分析的結果皆符合個人政治學習解釋的預期。本文除了從比較視野拓展Dalton的研究,針對臺灣的發現也意涵我國民主公民教育與公民精神的深化仍有相當大的改善空間。

With the consideration of Dalton’s “good citizens” theory, this study compares people’s normative beliefs about citizenship cross-nationally, and investigates individuals’ acquisition of citizenship norms by the case of Taiwan. By analyzing two waves of survey data of ISSP, we confirm that beliefs about citizenship norms can be divided into three aspects: civic responsibility, autonomous participation, and community duty. Also, respondents’citizenship norms in old democracies are different from those in new democracies, but patterns in the two country groups change in the same direction. Taking individuals’age into account, both our cross-national comparison and empirical analysis on Taiwanese respondents support the explanation of individuals’political learning. This study not only extends Dalton’s research to a comparative context, but also implies that there is still much room for improvement in democratic civic education and the deepening of citizenship norms of Taiwan.

關鍵字/Keyword
公民規範認知, 公民精神, 政治學習, 世代交替
citizenship norms, citizenship, political learning, alternation of generation
學科分類/Subject
政治學
Political Science
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • The Impact of Citizenship on Political Participation among Taiwan’s Public: Evidence from Two Citizenship Surveys in 2012 and 2018
  • What Change of Citizenship? Difference between Before and After the Second Party Alternation in Taiwan
  • The Public's Citizenship, Blue-Green Partisanship, and Attitudes toward Referendum in Taiwan
  • Scientific Knowledge and the Politics of Water: The Controversy on the Cishan River Flood Control
  • Political Disagreements and a Proposal of Public Reason Liberalism

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3