Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 33, Number 03
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2021 / September Volume 33 No.3
Political Disagreements and a Proposal of Public Reason Liberalism

Number of Clicks:3220; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of Full Text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2021 / September
中英文篇名/Title
政治爭議與公共理性自由主義的方案
Political Disagreements and a Proposal of Public Reason Liberalism
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
許漢
Hahn Hsu
頁碼/Pagination
529-565
摘要/Abstract

本文提出一個公共理性自由主義的觀念,是基於羅爾斯的政治自由主義所提出的一些修改,包括公共理性的內容、其理論地位以及方法論面的一些想法:一、公共理性所規範的政治議題是廣的;二、公共理性是一般政治道德原則,不只是政治價值或理想,是實質的,不只是程序規範;三、公共理性的內容包括公共善以及政治終極目的;四、公共理性的觀念與適用假設了社會有一定的自由民主的政治文化:五、公共理性自由主義在方法論上放棄羅爾斯抽離 的原初處境,公共理性的方法是脈絡化、植根在一個自由民主社會中的政治文 化及公共認同的傳統文化中的信念。

This paper proposes an idea of public reason liberalism, based on some revisions of Rawls’s political liberalism, which will include the following: 1) the scope of public reason is broader than Rawls’s; 2) the idea of public reason is to function as a general principle of liberal political morality, not just as a political value or a political ideal, not just providing procedural regulations but also being substantive; 3) the content of public reason includes public goods and the political final end; and 4) the idea of public reason applies only for a society with a liberal democratic culture; 5) regarding the methodology of theorizing, public reason liberalism rejects Rawls’s idea of original position, and instead adopts as its method the principle of public reason, which is contextualized and embedded in the political culture and publicly accepted traditional heritages of a liberal democracy.

關鍵字/Keyword
公共理性, 價值多元的事實, 公共善, 自由民主的政治文化與公共認同的傳統信念, 公民品德
public reason, fact of value pluralism, public good, political culture and publicly accepted traditional heritages of a liberal democracy, civic virtues
學科分類/Subject
政治學
Political Science
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X2021093303005
檔案下載/Download
Abstract Full Text
相關文章
  • The Impact of Citizenship on Political Participation among Taiwan’s Public: Evidence from Two Citizenship Surveys in 2012 and 2018
  • Evaluating the Revenue Effect of Public Investment
  • Popular Sovereignty and Dernocracy: An Interpretation of Carl Schrnitt's Theory of Dernocracy
  • The Republican Ideal and Political Innovation: A Comparison between Rousseau and Kant
  • Testing the “Good Citizens” Theory: Taiwanese Citizens in a Comparative Context

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3