Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 30, Number 03
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2018 / September Volume 30 No.3
Factors Determining Differences in Performance between the Large and Medium Chinese Steel Enterprises

Number of Clicks:2124; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2018 / September
中英文篇名/Title
中國大中型鋼鐵企業表現差異及其決定因素
Factors Determining Differences in Performance between the Large and Medium Chinese Steel Enterprises
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
張嘉麟, 瞿宛文
Chia-lin Chang, Wan-wen Chu
頁碼/Pagination
435-483
摘要/Abstract

中國在經歷90年代國企改革之後,國企在一些包括鋼鐵業的重工業仍占有主導性的地位,本文欲探究這些國企維持其領導性地位之原因,因此探討主導中國鋼鐵業發展的大中型企業之間的表現差異,及導致差異的來源和因素。結果發現,雖然中國鋼鐵國企普遍承擔較多社會責任,財務負擔較高,以致獲利能力較私企低,然而大型國企因有較高的規模經濟生產優勢,並容易受到中央政府的支持,使其擁有較中型國企和其他大中型私企高的生產效率;中型國企則因較無規模優勢,又有沉重的財務負擔,因此企業表現排名居末;而改制企業的企業表現已能接近於私企。

After China pushed through a massive reform of the state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the late 1990s, some SOEs still dominate heavy industries, including the steel industry. To study the reasons why these SOEs have been able to maintain their leading position, we investigate the difference in the performance of the large and medium steel enterprises in terms of ownership and scale, and analyze the causes of the difference in performance. Our results reveal that although some leading state-owned steel enterprises in China have higher financial burdens, probably due to their greater social responsibilities, they still have higher productivity because of their greater advantage of economies of scale, and they are more likely to be supported by the central government. The medium-sized SOEs perform worst because they don’t have the advantage of economies of scale and have higher financial burdens. In addition, the privatized enterprises perform like the private ones.

關鍵字/Keyword
國企改革, 企業表現, 中國產業, 鋼鐵產業
SOE reform, enterprise performance, Chinese industry, steel industry
學科分類/Subject
經濟學
Economics
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Industry Agglometration and Employment Creation -Evidence from Taiwan's Manufacturing Sector
  • “Internal Goes before International": A Historical Analysis of the Governance Structure of Taiwan Footwear Industry
  • The Effects of Guanxi on the Entry Mode Choice for Taiwanese Manufacturing Firms in China and Performance in an Imperfect Market
  • The Impact of Voluntary Export Restraints on the Competitive Exporting Firm
  • China Discourse from the Late Twentieth Century: A Dialogue between International Relations and History

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3