Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 30, Number 04
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2018 / December Volume 30 No.4
The Limitation and Compensation of Property Rights: A New Theoretical Framework

Number of Clicks:2466; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2018 / December
中英文篇名/Title
財產權的限制與補償:新理論分析框架
The Limitation and Compensation of Property Rights: A New Theoretical Framework
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
張永健
Yun-chien Chang
頁碼/Pagination
505-535
摘要/Abstract

「財產權重大限制」是指財產權雖然沒有被徵收,但受到超過「至為輕微」的管制。臺灣的「財產權重大限制」理論,主要有兩大缺失:第一,缺乏夠具體的判斷標準;第二,沒有現實可操作的補償計算方式。本文以大法官釋字第564 號解釋理由書,以侵害是否「至為輕微」作為區分特別犧牲和社會義務的判斷標準。本文並進一步主張,使用特徵迴歸模型與實價登錄數據,計算系爭不動產在管制前後的市場行情。市價差異可以用來判斷侵害是否至為微小而須給予補償;也可以作為補償數額的估價方式。

Current theories and constitutional interpretations on regulatory takings in Taiwan only vaguely distinguish regulations and regulatory takings, in addition to failing to advance any operable method to compute the amount of compensation. This article expands the de minimis standard raised in Constitutional Court Interpretation No. 564 and argues that constitutional law scholars should develop theories regarding which kind of implicit, in-kind compensation can be used to offset the regulated parties’ losses. This article explains how hedonic regression models and the big data on real estate transactions enable regulators and courts to calculate the market value of the real properties in question before and after a regulation. The difference in computed market value can be used to decide whether the limitation of property rights is de minimis—if not, the value gap should be compensated.

關鍵字/Keyword
騎樓, 公共設施保留地, 特徵迴歸模型, 財產權, 隱然非金錢補償, 大法官釋字第564號解釋, 至為輕微
pedestrian arcade, reserved land for public facilities, hedonic regression model , property rights, implicit in-kind compensation, Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 564, de minimis
學科分類/Subject
經濟學
Economics
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • A Thing Sold Twice: Efficient Breach of Contract or Tortious Interference with Contract
  • Reflections on the Legal Methodology and the Interpretation of Basic Rights: An Introductory Overview
  • The Logic of Collective Action in Protesting: A Rational Choice Analysis of the Anti-Chen Movement
  • Evaluating the Revenue Effect of Public Investment
  • The Great Definer: A New Perspective on Hobbes' Doctrine of Absolute Sovereignty

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3