Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》Volume 37, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2025 / March Volume 37 No.1
The European Union Tangles with the Energy Charter Treaty on the International Scene: Past, Present, and Future

Number of Clicks:1648; Number of Full Text Downloads:117; Number of Abstract Downloads:6;

發刊日期/Published Date
2025 / March
中英文篇名/Title
在國際層面上歐洲聯盟與能源憲章條約之糾葛與角力:過去、現在及未來
The European Union Tangles with the Energy Charter Treaty on the International Scene: Past, Present, and Future
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
歸奕軒
I-Hsuan Guei
頁碼/Pagination
37-89
摘要/Abstract

能源憲章條約於1994年創立之目的係加強和保護歐亞地區的能源投資,歐盟亦為締約國。但在創立之初並未預期原不屬於歐盟成員之東歐地區國家於日後加入此一聯盟,故歐盟內部之間的能源投資爭端如雨後春筍般湧現。至里斯本條約後歐盟法之架構已全然不同,而能源憲章條約並未與其做出相應之革新。更重要的是,歐洲聯盟法院與相關仲裁庭於詮釋歐盟法秩序與能源憲章條約第26條投資爭端解決機制之關係存在重大之歧異。有鑑於不同法律體系彼此互相之衝突,以及其相互關連之法律爭議相應而生,故能源憲章條約現代化之談判為解決問題之最佳方案。

The Energy Charter Treaty was adopted in 1994, with its signatories including the European Communities and its Member States, and its purpose being protecting energy investment in Europe and Asia. However, it was unforeseeable that most of the Eastern European countries would join the European Union. Therefore, intra-EU disputes under the Energy Charter Treaty have arisen. Additionally, while EU law has been constantly evolving for a long time, the Energy Charter Treaty concluded by the EU has not aligned with the European Union’s trade policy. Importantly, the Court of Justice of the European Union and arbitral tribunals have different views on the interplay between the Investor-State Dispute Settlement mechanism in Article 26 of the Energy Charter Treaty and the EU legal order. Subsequently, several legal issues would inevitably arise because of conflicts between the two legal regimes. Consequently, all eyes are currently on the modernization of the Energy Charter Treaty.

關鍵字/Keyword
能源憲章條約, 歐洲聯盟, 歐盟內部投資爭端, 投資人與地主國爭端解決機制, 歐洲聯盟法, 能源憲章條約第26條, 能源憲章條約現代化
Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), European Union, intra-EU disputes, investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), EU law, Article 26 of the Energy Charter Treaty, modernization of the Energy Charter Treaty
學科分類/Subject
政治學, 社會學
Political Science, Sociology
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X202205102
檔案下載/Download
Full Text Abstract
相關文章
  • The Polity of the EU under the Constitutional Treaty of Europe
  • Cooperation under the EU-China Systemic Rivalry
  • A Study on the Constitutionality of the 1999 Constitutional Amendamets
  • The Political Form of the European Union and the Inter-State Social-Contract Aspect of the EU Treaties: Revisiting the Federation Theories of Pufendorf, Montesquieu and Rousseau
  • A Thing Sold Twice: Efficient Breach of Contract or Tortious Interference with Contract

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3