Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 10, Number 02
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
1998 / June Volume 10 No.2
On Aristotle's Best Regime

Number of Clicks:2391; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
1998 / June
中英文篇名/Title
析論亞里斯多德之最佳政體
On Aristotle's Best Regime
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
莊國銘
Will K. M. Chuang
頁碼/Pagination
289-318
摘要/Abstract

本文旨在析論亞里斯多德的最佳政體究竟爲何。筆者發現,以公民德性之培養與共善之追求爲特色的貴族政體,應爲唯一符合亞里斯多德政治學與倫理學論旨的理想政治生活型態。本文認爲,亞里斯多德並非藉由政體論提出一理想的道德烏托邦,其政治學與倫理學著作便是他所提供予現實政治改革的大政方針。在這個理想政體中,雖然未必人人盡皆爲有德之人,但人們必須將德性之追求視爲人生的應然目的。亞里斯多德德性的政治社群觀點,展現了與當代人類共同生活偏重正當權利之追求相當不同的風貌。本文認爲,他的最佳政體理論所能提供予當代社會反省的最寶貴資源是,在人類的共同生活中,除了公正規則的建立之外,公民德性的重要性更是不容忽視的。

This paper explores Aristotle's idea of the best regime. It is usually assumed that polity is the best regime for Aristotle. I will argue that aristocracy, with an emphasis on common good and civic virtue, is the only regime which fulfills Aristotle's expectation of genuine political life. I also think that Aristotle's best regime is not a moral utopia, but a realistic project for political reform. In this ideal regime, every citizen may not be virtuous, but must be in pursuit of virtues as "telos", the final end of human life. Aristotle's views of virtuous community are significanthy different than the contemporary focus on the pursuit of legitimate rights in modern times. In conclusion, I argue that the significance of civic virtue cannot be neglected, for it is insufficient to have just rules alone if human beings are to lead a sound common life.

關鍵字/Keyword
亞里斯多德, 政體, 貴族政體, 共和政體, 德性, 共善
Aristotle, regime, aristocracy, polity, virtue, common good
學科分類/Subject

主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • The Republican Ideal and Political Innovation: A Comparison between Rousseau and Kant
  • Divided and Unified Government in Taiwan's Local Politics: The Cases of Hsin-chu County / City and Chia-yi County / City
  • An Analysis of Party Interaction from Roll-call Votes in Taiwan's Legislative Yuan: The Third Term to the Fifth Term of the Legislative Yuan
  • How Do We Interpret the Popular Support of Political Islam in the Muslim Societies? A Multilevel Analysis
  • The EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy and Its Actions during the Russia-Ukraine War: A Moment of Transformation?

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3