發刊日期/Published Date |
1998年3月
|
---|---|
中英文篇名/Title | 不動產仲介的法律關係與斡旋金的法律效力 Legal Implications of Real Estate Brokerages and the Legal Effect of Negotiation Deposits |
論文屬性/Type | 研究論文 Research Article |
作者/Author | |
頁碼/Pagination | 79-129 |
摘要/Abstract | 本文探討不動產仲介的法律關係與斡旋金的法律效力。第二部份從不動產和仲介的意義出發,說明不動產仲介的意義,並肯定不動產仲介的經濟作用,第三部分探討不動產仲介的法律性質及關係人的權利義務,第四部分說明斡旋金的意義及其經濟作用,第五部份澄清斡旋金的性質,並解釋其對關係人等的法律效力,第六部份就斡旋金發生糾紛的態樣,評析其法律效果,並提出交付斡旋金應行注意事項,第七部份將斡旋金與內政部提出的要約書相比較。本文結論認爲斡旋金制度對買方、賣方和仲介業者均有益處,可加速交易完成,節省交易成本。因此,應承認其效力,加以規範,但不應禁止。 This paper explores the legal implications of real estate brokerages and the legal effect of negotiation deposits. Beginning with the meanings of "real estate" and "brokerage", part two states the definition of a real estate brokerage and argues that it has a valuable economic function. Part three explores the legal nature of real estate brokerages concerning people's rights and obligations. Part four restates the meaning and economic function of negotiation deposits, and part five makes clear the nature of such deposits and explains their legal effect concerning people. Part six analyzes the legal effect of the various cases concerning negotiation deposits and presents the guidelines of delivering negotiation deposits. The seventh part compares negotiation deposits with a "certificate of offer" suggested by the Ministry of the Interior. Finally, this paper reaches the conclusion that negotiation deposits accelerate real estate transactions, reduce transaction costs, and are beneficial to buyers, sellers, and real estate brokers. For this reason, this paper argues that they should not be prohibited, but rather should be valid and regulated. |
關鍵字/Keyword | |
學科分類/Subject | |
主題分類/Theme | |
DOI | |
檔案下載/Download |