Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Forthcoming Papers
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
The Unimplemented Law: Welfare Politics of the Early Retirement for Persons with Disabilities in Taiwan

Number of Clicks:278; Number of PDF Downloads:19;

發刊日期/Published Date
中英文篇名/Title
從未落實的立法:臺灣身心障礙者提早退休政策的福利政治
The Unimplemented Law: Welfare Politics of the Early Retirement for Persons with Disabilities in Taiwan
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
周怡君, 施世駿
Yi-chun Chou, Shih-jiunn Shi
頁碼/Pagination
-
摘要/Abstract

《身心障礙者權益保障法》第47條規定政府應制定提早退休政策,但勞保迄今卻沒有落實。本文從理念制度主義觀點,透過質化研究資料,探討相關決策討論過程。發現在高層次理念上,受訪障礙者、政府代表與學者專家對「平等」概念排序差異明顯;而在政策與工具理念層次,三方行動者對改革失能年金、強化職場支持與合理調整等政策工具呈現共識。但是政府與學界掌握制度性話語權,透過專業語言形塑理念正當性,導致理念競逐不僅發生於價值層次,也呈現在許多政策設計細節,藉由技術論述主導權重塑改革正當性,進而削弱障礙者對於制度創新的訴求。

Although the People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act stipulates the government’s responsibility to enact early retirement measures for people with disabilities, this policy remains unimplemented despite active civic group initiatives in Taiwan. Drawing on the ideational institutionalist perspective, we analyze the policymaking processes leading to this outcome. Based on the analysis of data from semi-structured interviews conducted with government officials, policy experts, and advocacy groups, significant divergences exist among the key actors regarding the definition of “equality” as a normative value. Furthermore, despite a consensus on invalidity pension reform, workplace support, and reasonable accommodation, government officials and policy experts gained the upper hand in the ideational contestation, reframing policy discourse to question the necessity of early retirement. Policy discussion has marginalized advocacy groups advocating for this policy, leading to the failure of policy implementation.

關鍵字/Keyword
理念制度主義, 障礙者提早退休, 理念競逐, 勞工保險制度, 臺灣
ideational institutionalism, early retirement for people with disabilities, ideational contestation,, labor insurance, Taiwan
學科分類/Subject
社會學
Sociology
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X202602101
檔案下載/Download
PDF
相關文章
  • Dynamic Mechanism of Institutional Change: A Case Study in Transitions of the Central Bank System in Taiwan, 1949-61
  • How Could Rousseau’s Civil Religion Help Us Understand the Conflict of Beliefs in Modern Political Life?
  • An Empirical Analysis of the Democratic Peace and Non-democratic Peace Theses: The Critical Effects of Political Institutional Similarity
  • Institutional Analysis of the Organizational Expansion and Transformation of Social Work Education in Taiwan: The Influence of the Professional Social Worker Act in 1997
  • The Options of a Public Pension Program: The Financing Model and Simulations in Taiwan

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.4